Document Page: First | Prev | Next | All | Image | This Release | Search
File: 110196_aacaa_03.txt
products have been of acceptable quality, and with the exception of
some discolored meats, have not required rejection or throwing out.
A local bakery requesting a contract with this base was originally
rejected due to a major structural defect which allowed gold to
grow on the walls. The defective room was remodeled, and subse-
quently approved by our EHO technician, and later by the Army vet
erinary services. MOBS are also monitored at this base for
quality, temperature storage, and dates of expiration. Food
service at this base is contracted. Food handler physicals were
performed on approximately 40 individuals to obtain 20 needed
employees. A physical exam, chest X-ray, and stool specimen were
obtained. Disqualifications were equally divided for stool
parasites, abnormal cheat X-rays, and poor hygiene (especially
oral). Disqualified workers were referred to local physicians for
treatment.
9. The arrival of the 111th Army Reserve Contingency Hospital
at a nearby site provided sub-specialty consultant as well as some
staging concerns for anticipated aeroevacuation casualties. The
availability of an ophthalmologist , urologist, and a full time or--
thopedist was a particularly valuable addition to our delivery of
medical care. Patients with these problems had been previously
airlifted or seen by specialists at the host-nation hospital. The
air-evacuation system. It has been anticipated that patients would
arrive at this air base (OMAD) and be transported by ground ambu-
lance However, no aeromedical staging facility is located at this
base. Current arrangements are for a nine member team to man a two
section temper tent prior to and during patient on and off loading.
Our clinic has agreed to provide any back-up response for emergen-
cies and unexpected arrivals.
10. Aeromedical concerns centered around clearest, altered
circadian rhythms, and flying duties while taking medication. Dur-
ing the initial air war, aircrews were completing 12 to 20 bout
duty days with 12 to 16 hours crew rest. For example, 41 ECS crew
days lasted 12 to 15 hours, followed typically by 16 hours of crew
rest. Show times for aircrews would push back four to eight hours
daily (for example, day #1/0100; day '2/0500; day a]/ 0900; day
,4/1300, act.). While flying this schedule, several crew members
complained of sleep disturbances, as well as fatigue and drowsiness
when performing crew duties. These problems were more common among
mission crew members than flight crews. A survey was distributed
by the 41 ECS Flight surgeon to aircrews, eliciting an 80% response
rate. A majority of flyers noted difficulty with rotating show
times, and almost unanimously fixed show times; even if it
.meant crew rest would be limited to 12 hours. the 41 ECS DO event-
ually arranged a schedule with either two day or two night sorties
followed by a 24 hour rest period. (for example, day ,1/0100 show;
two crews performed mission planning and provided aircrews to
replace ONIF'ed hard crew members. This rotation limited show time
changes to six bourn rather than 24 hours, and provided crew mem
bers a 24 bour break every third day.
Document Page: First | Prev | Next | All | Image | This Release | Search