Document Page: First | Prev | Next | All | Image | This Release | Search
File: 970207_aadcv_010.txt
TOPIC AREA: CREW MANAGEMENT / UTC STAFFING / STANDARDIZATION OF
TRAINING
SUBMITTED BY: HQ AFRES/SGXO
ISSUE: Assignment of tactical (C-130 trained) crews to support a
strategic mission reduced mission capability.
OBSERVATION: The mission of the NRAECC at RAF Upper Heyford was
to accomplish U.K. to CONUS aeromedical evacuation missions.
However, only 20 of 65 assigned medical crews were qualified on
C-141 aircraft.
DISCUSSION: Personnel from units having a tactical mission were
deployed into a strategic situation. We were instructed that the
Medical Crew Director and Charge Medical Technician on each
mission had to be C-141 qualified. This resulted in a total crew
capability of 39 based on the number of qualified MCDs assigned.
Based on estimated patient workloads, we would have exhausted
medical crews in three days. This observation has been made
numerous times over the years and still has not been fixed.
IMPACT: This would require an increase in manpower
authorizations for all C-130 aeromedical evacuation units.
Further analysis is required.
RECOMMENDATION: Mission statements of both strategic and
tactical aeromedical evacuation units should be updated to
include their dual tactical/strategic role in aeromedical
evacuation and all medical crews must be required to be mission
qualified in both tactical and strategic movement segments.
Although the "crew is a crew" concept has been discussed for many
years, it is obvious that necessary training has not been
accomplished. Only the low patient count in Operation Desert
Storm saved the aeromedical evacuation system from revealing this
weakness. We can no longer afford to neglect this serious
training deficiency.
9
Document Page: First | Prev | Next | All | Image | This Release | Search