Document Page: First | Prev | Next | All | Image | This Release | Search
File: 980226_aug96_sagwi2_0034.txt
Box ID = BX000524
Folder Title = HISTORIANS BACKGROUND MATERIAL FILES CALL COMBAT COLLECTION PLAN
Unit = ARCENT
Parent Org = CENTCOM
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ISSUE SUB-TASK LEVEL(S) PREQUEI@Y LOCATION
a Was the Scenario-determined,
-------------------------- - --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Computer Assisted Logistics
Planning (SCALP) System used
in this deployment? If not,
why rot? Nov could the SCALP
system have served the
deployment team in a more advantageous manner?
awere any of the Logger Theater/corps/Bil/ sustainment
Series Templates used in Bde
configured the deployment?
If so, which ones? low
could the above Logger
Series Templates be made
more usable to deploying forces?
oDid CSS stafl planners use the
traditional decision mak4@g
process (FM 101-5) or all
abbreviated process? it
abbreviated, why? Who
lecided?
low effective?
oWhere were maintenance support
teams located?
oWhat LOGC2 problems occurred
when .,nits from various
locations landed in the
theatre of operations?
o,aining
oWere there any recorde@
instances of support failures
or impaired missions attrib-
uted to CSs command and
staff or unit training
deficiencies?
oWhat were the signified,'
maintenance problems
attributed to training
shortfalls? Before deploy-
ment? 0,.r4ng deployment?
after, deployment?
oWere the maintenance problems
listed above the result of
inadequate training of
mechanics, inadequate "rai-.-
4nq of supervisors (ES to E?),
or inadequate training ol
specific items of equi?me:tt?
Document Page: First | Prev | Next | All | Image | This Release | Search