Document Page: First | Prev | Next | All | Image | This Release | Search

File: 970903_oct1_0047.txt
Page: 0047
Total Pages: 106







      NBC Defense




      Corps AR-5 Aircraft Protective Mask. Diagrams of the M17A2, MC-U2/P, M25, and
      M24 are provided in Appendix F-4. Personnel surveyed stated a high degree of
      confidence that their issued mask would perform well if needed (see Appendix E- 1 2).

            (S) Operationally, a major source of ftustration for all Marines was the inability
      of the Ml 7A2's to rapidly replace contan-dnated filter elements without mask removal.
      This was not a problem with Navy MCU-2/P, standard issue to the Naval Construction
      Regiment under the MEF. The MCU-2/P has a screw on filter canister sirrdlar to and
      compatible with NATO mask canisters used by the British and others in SWA. All NBC
      office-S were ve-y concerned that a newer protective mask was not fielded in time for
      use in SWA. Unconfirmed rumors that the Army had fielded the new M40 series mask,
      with sc.-ew on filter car@s[ers, angered many.

            (S) Another operational concern of all front-line Marines was vision restriction
      encountered when wearing the M17A2. The vision restriction and mask lens geometry
      coupled together causes problems with weapon sighting systems on the TOW, SAW, and
      armored vehicles. This is partly the fault of weapons designers, as weapon sights must
      be beire- designed to accommodate protective masks. Many medical personnel asked
      why they couldn't have used the Navy standard MCU-2/P's as the full-view faceshield
      would have facilitated working on casualties.

             (S) Armored vehicle crewmen had special problems with masks concerning
      communication, vision, cumbersome air hoses, drinking capability, and serious mask
      shortages. The M25 tankers mask was not designed with a drinking tube capability.
      With ampufled desert temperatures in armored vehicles a drffiking capability was a
      must for vehicle crewmen, in M60 tanks, Light Armored vehicles (L&Vs) and Assault
      Amphibian Vehicles (AA\rs). This was nor a problem in the MIAI tank which had a
      collective protection systems. Crewmen found it necessary to keep an M17A2, in
      addition to the M25, in their vel-dcle for use outside the vehicle and to provide a
      drinking capability. innovative Marines went a step ftu-ther and cut the microphones
      out of their issued M25 masks, which were in critically short supply and no longer in
      production. These microphones were then taped to the M17A2 to provide a single
      mask with conununicadon hook-up arxd drink capabihry (see photograph, Appendix
      G-1 0).51 Their only complaint with this modification was with difficulty in weapon
      sighting. Ln fact, they were happy to be rid of au the hose attachments of the M25
      mask. Because of the great amount of time spent riding open-hatch and with ingress
      and egress of infantry, LAV and AAV unit NBC Officers suggested a new mask be
      obtained with a fuu-face sweld, communication adapter, drinking rube, and easy



          5@MCCLS tape #886
                                              400ow
                                                   38

Document Page: First | Prev | Next | All | Image | This Release | Search