Document Page: First | Prev | Next | All | Image | This Release | Search
File: aabmf_26.txt(1) Activation of ARC Forces. Observation. Air National Guard AE elements were allowed to volunteer for 30-day periods for the first five months of the operation, while at the same time, Air Force Reserve AE elements were both voluntarily and involuntarily activated by UTC. Discussion. ANG personnel were given the option of volunteering for thirty-day periods, with an option to extend in fifteen-day increments, for the first five months of Operation DESERT SHIELD. This policy caused severe problems in establishing and maintaining continuity of AE operations throughout the AOR, with specific problems in mission coverage, billeting and tracking of individuals as the theater expanded to over ten AECH beddown locations. After travel time into and out of the AOR, jet lag adjustment, and orientation, only minimum time was available for mission tasking. As a result, many of the personnel at C-130 beddown locations had to be replaced every two weeks. The NGB rotation policy, although essential to filling the immediate need for AE personnel in August and September, became very cumbersome and time consuming to manage as the number of AECMs increased to support the AE system. Additionally, activating AFRes forces by UTC at the same time the ANG forces were allowed to volunteer caused additional problems. Unit commanders had difficulty in filling UTCs with available personnel since entire units weren't activated. Moreover, the dichotomy of policies resulted in major morale problems among the AE forces Recommendation. Although volunteers are essential to meet the immediate personnel demands during the initial phase of any AE contingency operation, activation of ARC personnel should be for a minimum of 90 days to ensure adequate mission support and continuity of operations. Most importantly, the NGB and AFRes need to have coordinated and standardized activation policies for contingency operations. (2) AE Chain of Command. Observation. Early in the Operation, confusion existed within some CENTAF directorates as to the chain of command for AE forces. Discussion. Many personnel are apparently not aware that AE forces work for the Commander, Airlift Forces, not the Theater Surgeon. Although this misunderstanding never caused significant problems, at least in the AOR, it did result in some confusion as to ownership of personnel and assets. Recommendation. The publishing of MACR 164-1 should clarify the AE chain of command, at least within MAC. However, Air Force and DOD regulations must be perfectly clear on this point to ensure understanding on the part of the other major commands, as well as our sister services. 26
Document Page: First | Prev | Next | All | Image | This Release | Search