Document Page: First | Prev | Next | All | Image | This Release | Search
File: 111396_aacvt_22.txt
to each site in tbe AOR.
In order to take advantage of inter-operability with our Saudi
host, we deployed our aircraft at bases where they had similar
weapon systems or depots, i.e., F-15s and E-3As. We negotiated a
swap arrangement in which either party would be issued a part with
the guarantee of a one for one replacement. This proved to work
well for both the US and Saudi Air Forces.
When hostilities ceased, an orderly plan was developed to close
bases and base supply accounts. A time table was established when
aviation packages would depart each site, with a base closure
working group determining when each base should be completely
vacated. LGS worked on a base closure plan and coordinated with
each Chief of Supply to determine when certain records should be
transferred by CSSA to home station, when peacetime operating
stocks should be packaged and sent back to the CONUS, how to
teardown and package Harvest Falcon equipment and forward it to the
aggregation site, and when to formally close the account.
Communications was critical because the communication plan was to
"turn off" all communication lines four days after the aviation
package departed. Disposition of materiel, i.e., war reserve
materiel, follow-on spares, and accumulated primaty operating
stock, was critical to reconstitution of forces at home station.
Therefore, working guidance was provided to units to move property
in the right direction. Weapon system spares, to include FOSK,
HPMSK, WRSK, support equipment and operating stocks, would be
Document Page: First | Prev | Next | All | Image | This Release | Search